Reliability and structural validity of an assessment of occupational value

Aaron M. Eakman, Mona Eklund

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Citations (SciVal)
164 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This study evaluated the psychometric properties of the American English (Am. Eng.) version of the Occupational Value Assessment with predefined items (OVal-pd). The OVal-pd is a 26-item Likert-like questionnaire designed to assess the construct of occupational value as framed within the Value and Meaning in Occupations model (ValMO). Following a translation from the Swedish OVal-pd, 277 randomly selected graduate and undergraduate students from a public university in the northwestern United Stated completed the Am. Eng. OVal-pd. Test-retest and internal consistency reliability coefficients were very good utilizing an improved 22-item version of the OVal-pd. The structural validity of the 22-item Am. Eng. OVap-pd was partly confirmed through exploratory factor analysis. The scale was found to assess a one-dimensional value construct supporting the ValMO model, consisting of components clearly reflective of self-reward and concrete value. Exploratory factor analysis results were equivocal with regard to the symbolic dimension of the ValMO model as assessed by the OVal-pd. Discussion suggests the refinement of both the OVal-pd and ValMO model in the light of present and related empirical findings.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)231-240
JournalScandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy
Volume18
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Bibliographical note

The information about affiliations in this record was updated in December 2015.
The record was previously connected to the following departments: Division of Occupational Therapy (Closed 2012) (013025000)

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Occupational Therapy

Keywords

  • Instrument development
  • human activity
  • meaningful occupation
  • occupational therapy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reliability and structural validity of an assessment of occupational value'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this