Reliability and validity of the assessment of neurological soft-signs in children with and without attention-deficit-hyperactivity disorder

Peik Gustafsson, Carl Göran Svedin, Ingegerd Ericsson, Christian Lindén, Magnus Karlsson, Gunilla Thernlund

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

AIM To study the value and reliability of an examination of neurological soft-signs, often used in Sweden, in the assessment of children with attentiondeficit– hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), by examining children with and without ADHD, as diagnosed by an experienced clinician using the DSM-III-R.
METHOD We have examined interrater reliability (26males, nine females; age range 5y 6mo–11y), internal consistency (94males, 43 females; age range 5y 6mo–11y), test–retest reliability (12 males, eight females; age range 6–9y), and validity (79 males, 33 females; age range 5y 6mo–9y).
RESULTS The sum of the scores for the items on the examination had good interrater reliability (intraclass correlation [ICC] 0.95) and acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha 0.76). The test–retest study also showed good reliability (ICC 0.91). There weremodest associations between the examination and the assessment of motor function made by the physical education teacher (ICC 0.37)
as well as from the parents’ description (ICC 0.39). The examination of neurological soft-signs had a sensitivity of 0.80 and a specificity of 0.76 in predicting motor problems as evaluated by the physical education teacher.
INTERPRETATION The reliability and validity of this examination seem to be good and can be recommended for clinical practice and research.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)364-370
JournalDevelopmental Medicine & Child Neurology
Volume52
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Psychiatry
  • Orthopaedics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reliability and validity of the assessment of neurological soft-signs in children with and without attention-deficit-hyperactivity disorder'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this