Reply to ‘Uppermost Cambrian carbon chemostratigraphy: The HERB and undocumented TOCE events are not synonymous’

Maoyan Zhu, Loren E. Babcock, Shanchi Peng, Per Ahlberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In a recent communication on carbon isotope chemostratigraphy of the uppermost Cambrian strata, it was claimed that the Top of Cambrian Excursion (TOCE) is (1) an undocumented negative δ13Ccarb excursion; (2) ambiguously defined; (3) deliberately fictitious or, in the authors’ words, a ‘nihilartikel’; and (4) not synonymous with the Hellnmaria–Red Tops Boundary (HERB) Event. As the authors who have been involved in much of the discussion surrounding the TOCE since its introduction and in subsequent clarification, we wish to emphasize that the recent communication overlooks the fact that the TOCE is in fact a well-documented and clearly defined negative δ13Ccarb excursion, and that the term ‘HERB Event’ was originally used informally, without definition or reference data, for a negative δ13Ccarb peak, a peak later shown to occur within the TOCE excursion. Nearly a decade after the TOCE was named, the concept of the HERB Event was modified from a negative δ13Ccarb peak to a negative δ13Ccarb excursion, making it conceptually synonymous with the TOCE excursion. The recently published commentary is misleading and replete with misconceptions, as we discuss here.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1323-1326
Number of pages4
JournalGeological Magazine
Volume158
Issue number7
Early online date2020 Oct 12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021 Jul 1

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Geology

Free keywords

  • Cambrian
  • Chemostratigraphy
  • HERB
  • TOCE

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reply to ‘Uppermost Cambrian carbon chemostratigraphy: The HERB and undocumented TOCE events are not synonymous’'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this