Rescue Effect Inherited in Colony Formation Assays Affects Radiation Response

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

It is well known that nonirradiated cells can exhibit radiation damage (bystander effect), and recent findings have shown that nonirradiated cells may help protect irradiated cells (rescue effect). These findings call into question the traditional view of radiation response: cells cannot be envisioned as isolated units. Here, we investigated traditional colony formation assays to determine if they also comprise cellular communication affecting the radiation response, using colony formation assays with varying numbers of cells, modulated beam irradiation and media transfer. Our findings showed that surviving fraction gradually increased with increasing number of irradiated cells. Specifically, for DU-145 human prostate cancer cells, surviving fraction increased 1.9-to-4.1-fold after 5-12 Gy irradiation; and for MM576 human melanoma cells, surviving fraction increased 1.9-fold after 5 Gy irradiation. Furthermore, increased surviving fraction was evident after modulated beam irradiation, where irradiated cells could communicate with nonirradiated cells. Media from dense cell culture also increased surviving fraction. The results suggest that traditional colony formation assays comprise unavoidable cellular communication affecting radiation outcome and the shape of the survival curve. We also propose that the increased in-field surviving fraction after modulated beam irradiation is due to the same effect.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)44-52
Number of pages9
JournalRadiation Research
Volume189
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018 Jan

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Cancer and Oncology
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Medical Imaging
  • Other Physics Topics

Free keywords

  • Journal Article

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Rescue Effect Inherited in Colony Formation Assays Affects Radiation Response'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this