Abstract
Purpose: In the context of the general funding scarcity in the nonprofit sector, this paper aims to inquire into the governance challenges facing nonprofit aid organizations in a donor–recipient partner relationship. In particular, the authors focus on the challenges of commercial diversification as the espoused alternative to aid-funding. Design/methodology/approach: A qualitative design was deployed to collect and analyze data collected from interviews conducted in three case organizations in an aid development partnership. Findings: The various responses at the organizational level are presented as well as analyses of the inter-organizational aspects. All organizations have responded strategically to reductions in funding from state/government and other aid sources by attempting to diversify commercially yet at the same time maintain dependency on aid-funding. This entailed tensions between the logics of the market and mission. These tensions are manifest not only within the organizations but also in the relations between them. Originality/value: Analyses of the twin-track strategies have highlighted that maintaining aid dependency and resource diversification have different and conflicting relational prerequisites and require diverse and conflicting internal capabilities. The paper develops a conceptual framework for capturing the governance challenges of this strategic dilemma and concludes that the choices of pursuing continued aid-funding and seeking new commercial opportunities are invariably mutually exclusive.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 91-110 |
Journal | Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change |
Volume | 17 |
Issue number | 1 |
Early online date | 2020 Dec 7 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2020 |
Subject classification (UKÄ)
- Business Administration
Free keywords
- Aid-dependency
- Alignment
- Donor–partner relations
- Governance
- Legitimacy
- Marketization
- Nonprofit organizations