TY - GEN
T1 - Response patterns in finger and central body skin temperatures under mild whole body cooling
AU - Vanggaard, Leif
AU - Kuklane, Kalev
AU - Smolander, Juhani
AU - Holmér, Ingvar
PY - 2011
Y1 - 2011
N2 - INTRODUCTION
The actual heat loss may be underestimated especially in studies employing mild whole-body cooling, if AVA-rich distal areas are not taken into account. In the present report, we illustrate the skin temperature response pattern in fingers (rich in AVAs) to transient whole-body cooling as compared to non-acral body sites (without AVAs).
METHODS
Eight men participated in the study. During the test the subjects were dressed in shorts, socks and shoes and stayed seated with the arms on insulated supports at heart level. The air temperature of 32 °C was after 25 minutes gradually reduced to 13 °C (0.2 °C/min). Core, finger (sulcus lateral to the nailbed) and non-acral skin (8 points) temperatures were measured.
RESULTS
During cooling the mean skin temperature in all subjects decreased at a similar rate. Higher variation in the end of the cooling could be explained by differences in body fat (R2=0.902). Simultaneously, the finger cooling could start with up to about 1 hour difference in different subjects.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION
Mean skin temperature did not give any idea on when the subjects left thermal neutrality. It is strongly recommended to measure finger (or toe) temperatures when maintaining the thermal comfort of the subjects in dynamic conditions is important.
AB - INTRODUCTION
The actual heat loss may be underestimated especially in studies employing mild whole-body cooling, if AVA-rich distal areas are not taken into account. In the present report, we illustrate the skin temperature response pattern in fingers (rich in AVAs) to transient whole-body cooling as compared to non-acral body sites (without AVAs).
METHODS
Eight men participated in the study. During the test the subjects were dressed in shorts, socks and shoes and stayed seated with the arms on insulated supports at heart level. The air temperature of 32 °C was after 25 minutes gradually reduced to 13 °C (0.2 °C/min). Core, finger (sulcus lateral to the nailbed) and non-acral skin (8 points) temperatures were measured.
RESULTS
During cooling the mean skin temperature in all subjects decreased at a similar rate. Higher variation in the end of the cooling could be explained by differences in body fat (R2=0.902). Simultaneously, the finger cooling could start with up to about 1 hour difference in different subjects.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION
Mean skin temperature did not give any idea on when the subjects left thermal neutrality. It is strongly recommended to measure finger (or toe) temperatures when maintaining the thermal comfort of the subjects in dynamic conditions is important.
M3 - Paper in conference proceeding
VL - XIV
SP - 124
EP - 127
BT - Environmental Ergonomics
A2 - Kounalakis, Stylianos
A2 - Koskolou, Maria
PB - National and Kapodestrian University of Athens
T2 - XIV International Conference on Environmental Ergonomics
Y2 - 10 July 2011 through 15 July 2011
ER -