Review of Good Knowledge, Bad Knowledge (Hetherington, Oxford UP)

Research output: Contribution to journalReview (Book/Film/Exhibition/etc.)

Abstract

In this book, Stephen Hetherington attacks what he thinks are two "dogmas" of epistemology. One he calls "epistemic absolutism" which amounts to the claim that knowledge is absolute: you can be with or without it, but once you have it, it is not possible to have more or less. The other is "justificationalism" which is the view that some sort of (internalist of externalist) justification is necessary for knowledge.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)106-111
JournalTheoria: a Swedish Journal of Philosophy
Volume70
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2004

Bibliographical note

Reviewed Work(s):
Good knowledge, bad knowledge : on two dogmas of epistemology, Oxford UP (by Hetherington, Stephen Cade)

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Philosophy

Keywords

  • Review Knowledge Epistemology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Review of Good Knowledge, Bad Knowledge (Hetherington, Oxford UP)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this