RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, Isopulegol, CAS Registry Number 89-79-2

A. M. Api; D. Belsito; S. Bhatia; M. Bruze; P. Calow; M. L. Dagli; W. Dekant; A. D. Fryer; L. Kromidas; S. La Cava; J. F. Lalko; A. Lapczynski; D. C. Liebler; T. M. Penning; V. T. Politano; G. Ritacco; D. Salvito; T. W. Schultz; J. Shen; I. G. Sipes; B. Wall; D. K. Wilcox

doi:10.1016/j.fct.2016.08.001

RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, Isopulegol, CAS Registry Number 89-79-2

A. M. Api, D. Belsito, S. Bhatia, M. Bruze, P. Calow, M. L. Dagli, W. Dekant, A. D. Fryer, L. Kromidas, S. La Cava, J. F. Lalko, A. Lapczynski, D. C. Liebler, T. M. Penning, V. T. Politano, G. Ritacco, D. Salvito, T. W. Schultz, J. Shen, I. G. SipesB. Wall, D. K. Wilcox

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

This material was evaluated for genotoxicity, repeated dose toxicity, developmental and reproductive toxicity, local respiratory toxicity, phototoxicity/photoallergenicity, skin sensitization, as well as environmental safety. Data show that this material is not genotoxic nor does it have skin sensitization potential. The repeated dose, developmental and reproductive, and local respiratory toxicity endpoints were completed using the TTC (Threshold of Toxicological Concern) for a Cramer Class I material (0.03, 0.03 mg/kg/day and 1.4 mg/day, respectively). The phototoxicity/photoallergenicity endpoint was completed based on suitable UV spectra. The environmental endpoint was completed as described in the RIFM Framework.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	S129-S135
Journal	Food and Chemical Toxicology
Volume	97
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2016.08.001
Publication status	Published - 2016 Nov 1
Externally published	Yes

Subject classification (UKÄ)

Dermatology and Venereal Diseases
Pharmacology and Toxicology

Free keywords

Developmental and reproductive toxicity
Environmental safety
Genotoxicity
Local respiratory toxicity
Phototoxicity/photoallergenicity
Repeated dose
Skin sensitization

Access to Document

10.1016/j.fct.2016.08.001

Cite this

Api, A. M., Belsito, D., Bhatia, S., Bruze, M., Calow, P., Dagli, M. L., Dekant, W., Fryer, A. D., Kromidas, L., La Cava, S., Lalko, J. F., Lapczynski, A., Liebler, D. C., Penning, T. M., Politano, V. T., Ritacco, G., Salvito, D., Schultz, T. W., Shen, J., ... Wilcox, D. K. (2016). RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, Isopulegol, CAS Registry Number 89-79-2. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 97, S129-S135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2016.08.001

@article{42301092d452481b80ed00a4368292bd,

title = "RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, Isopulegol, CAS Registry Number 89-79-2",

abstract = "This material was evaluated for genotoxicity, repeated dose toxicity, developmental and reproductive toxicity, local respiratory toxicity, phototoxicity/photoallergenicity, skin sensitization, as well as environmental safety. Data show that this material is not genotoxic nor does it have skin sensitization potential. The repeated dose, developmental and reproductive, and local respiratory toxicity endpoints were completed using the TTC (Threshold of Toxicological Concern) for a Cramer Class I material (0.03, 0.03 mg/kg/day and 1.4 mg/day, respectively). The phototoxicity/photoallergenicity endpoint was completed based on suitable UV spectra. The environmental endpoint was completed as described in the RIFM Framework.",

keywords = "Developmental and reproductive toxicity, Environmental safety, Genotoxicity, Local respiratory toxicity, Phototoxicity/photoallergenicity, Repeated dose, Skin sensitization",

author = "Api, {A. M.} and D. Belsito and S. Bhatia and M. Bruze and P. Calow and Dagli, {M. L.} and W. Dekant and Fryer, {A. D.} and L. Kromidas and {La Cava}, S. and Lalko, {J. F.} and A. Lapczynski and Liebler, {D. C.} and Penning, {T. M.} and Politano, {V. T.} and G. Ritacco and D. Salvito and Schultz, {T. W.} and J. Shen and Sipes, {I. G.} and B. Wall and Wilcox, {D. K.}",

year = "2016",

month = nov,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1016/j.fct.2016.08.001",

language = "English",

volume = "97",

pages = "S129--S135",

journal = "Food and Chemical Toxicology",

issn = "0278-6915",

publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Api, AM, Belsito, D, Bhatia, S, Bruze, M, Calow, P, Dagli, ML, Dekant, W, Fryer, AD, Kromidas, L, La Cava, S, Lalko, JF, Lapczynski, A, Liebler, DC, Penning, TM, Politano, VT, Ritacco, G, Salvito, D, Schultz, TW, Shen, J, Sipes, IG, Wall, B & Wilcox, DK 2016, 'RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, Isopulegol, CAS Registry Number 89-79-2', Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 97, pp. S129-S135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2016.08.001

TY - JOUR

T1 - RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, Isopulegol, CAS Registry Number 89-79-2

AU - Api, A. M.

AU - Belsito, D.

AU - Bhatia, S.

AU - Bruze, M.

AU - Calow, P.

AU - Dagli, M. L.

AU - Dekant, W.

AU - Fryer, A. D.

AU - Kromidas, L.

AU - La Cava, S.

AU - Lalko, J. F.

AU - Lapczynski, A.

AU - Liebler, D. C.

AU - Penning, T. M.

AU - Politano, V. T.

AU - Ritacco, G.

AU - Salvito, D.

AU - Schultz, T. W.

AU - Shen, J.

AU - Sipes, I. G.

AU - Wall, B.

AU - Wilcox, D. K.

PY - 2016/11/1

Y1 - 2016/11/1

N2 - This material was evaluated for genotoxicity, repeated dose toxicity, developmental and reproductive toxicity, local respiratory toxicity, phototoxicity/photoallergenicity, skin sensitization, as well as environmental safety. Data show that this material is not genotoxic nor does it have skin sensitization potential. The repeated dose, developmental and reproductive, and local respiratory toxicity endpoints were completed using the TTC (Threshold of Toxicological Concern) for a Cramer Class I material (0.03, 0.03 mg/kg/day and 1.4 mg/day, respectively). The phototoxicity/photoallergenicity endpoint was completed based on suitable UV spectra. The environmental endpoint was completed as described in the RIFM Framework.

AB - This material was evaluated for genotoxicity, repeated dose toxicity, developmental and reproductive toxicity, local respiratory toxicity, phototoxicity/photoallergenicity, skin sensitization, as well as environmental safety. Data show that this material is not genotoxic nor does it have skin sensitization potential. The repeated dose, developmental and reproductive, and local respiratory toxicity endpoints were completed using the TTC (Threshold of Toxicological Concern) for a Cramer Class I material (0.03, 0.03 mg/kg/day and 1.4 mg/day, respectively). The phototoxicity/photoallergenicity endpoint was completed based on suitable UV spectra. The environmental endpoint was completed as described in the RIFM Framework.

KW - Developmental and reproductive toxicity

KW - Environmental safety

KW - Genotoxicity

KW - Local respiratory toxicity

KW - Phototoxicity/photoallergenicity

KW - Repeated dose

KW - Skin sensitization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84994201675&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.fct.2016.08.001

DO - 10.1016/j.fct.2016.08.001

M3 - Article

C2 - 27495825

AN - SCOPUS:84994201675

SN - 0278-6915

VL - 97

SP - S129-S135

JO - Food and Chemical Toxicology

JF - Food and Chemical Toxicology

ER -

RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, Isopulegol, CAS Registry Number 89-79-2

Abstract

Subject classification (UKÄ)

Free keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this