Abstract
The paper demonstrates how two quantitative risk analysis (QRA) methods may be used to evaluate the risk to which the occupants of a building may be subjected if a fire breaks out. The methods (standard QRA and extended QRA) differ in terms of how uncertainties in the variables are considered. The extended QRA explicitly considers uncertainty as it is a part of the methodology. The standard QRA has to be complemented with a sensitivity analysis to fully provide insight into the uncertainty inherent in the scenario. Both methods are applied to a calculation example determining the societal risk for a hospital ward. The analyses are performed as Monte Carlo simulations.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 313-329 |
| Journal | Fire Safety Journal |
| Volume | 31 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1998 |
Subject classification (UKÄ)
- Other Civil Engineering
- Building Technologies
Free keywords
- Monte Carlo
- Risk evaluation
- Risk analysis
- Event tree
- Fire
- Evacuation
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Risk analysis and fire safety engineering'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver