Abstract
The difference between evaluatively loaded and evaluatively neutralized fivefactor inventory items was used to create new variables, one for each factor in the fivefactor model. Study 1 showed that these variables can be represented in terms of a general evaluative factor which is related to social desirability measures and indicated that the factor may equally well be represented as separate from the Big Five as superordinate to them. Study 2 revealed an evaluative factor in self-ratings and peer ratings of the Big Five, but the evaluative factor in self-reports did not correlate with such a factor in ratings by peers. In Study 3 the evaluative factor contributed above the Big Five in predicting work performance, indicating a substance component. The results are discussed in relation to measurement issues and self-serving biases.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 144-157 |
Journal | Journal of Individual Differences |
Volume | 35 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2014 |
Subject classification (UKÄ)
- Psychology
Free keywords
- social desirability
- personality
- self-ratings
- Big Five