Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Social Media, Anti-Corruption Activism and Democratisation in Authoritarian Contexts: A Case Study of Uzbekistan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

239 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article aims to examine the nexus between social media, anti-corruption activism and democratisation in authoritarian regime contexts. It will investigate the complex ways in which civil society actors utilise art and humour on social media platforms to engage in covert anti-corruption activism. In doing so, we will show how, in authoritarian contexts, digital (social media) activists creatively navigate the constraints under the conditions of authoritarianism while seeking to address issues of corruption and government inefficiencies. This inquiry is timely given the global surge in authoritarianism. The study focuses on Uzbekistan, exemplifying the challenges of transitioning from repressive to softer authoritarianism while grappling with corruption and limited media freedom. Insights from this analysis offer valuable perspectives on civil society resilience, technology's role, and the pursuit of transparency in non-democratic settings.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)251
Number of pages276
JournalDemokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization
Volume32
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2024 Aug 31

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Law
  • Media and Communication Studies
  • Political Science (excluding Peace and Conflict Studies)

Free keywords

  • social media
  • ART
  • Humour
  • Authoritarianism
  • Democratization
  • anti-corruption

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Social Media, Anti-Corruption Activism and Democratisation in Authoritarian Contexts: A Case Study of Uzbekistan'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this