Social Robots for Social Institutions: Scaling Up and Cutting Back on Cognition

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingPaper in conference proceedingpeer-review

Abstract

Current technological change is rapid and far-reaching, more so than ever before in human history. It is transforming all dimensions of human life, leading to large-scale adaptation. Among the disruptive new technologies that are being introduced into society, social robots are distinguished by their hybrid existence between mere thing and mindful agent. They are physical machines capable of interacting with the surroundings and designed to collaborate with humans on human tasks while interacting in human ways. In contrast to rescue, delivery, and patrol robots that replace human labour, these robots take social roles such as tutor, peer, learner, companion, or assistant. On a more general note, social robots are expected to work closely with humans—as partner, colleague, family, and friend. Yet, that a robot can act as a social entity, does not entail the robot
constitutes a social being in its own right [1]. The question is whether social robots are capable of participating in and contributing to human social institutions such as healthcare, education, and economy; and if this is so, the follow-up question concerns what this may entail for society in the longer perspective. The emphasis of the present talk lies on the first question, the supposed contribution of social robots to social institutions. Raising a few queries concerning the ability of the BDI-paradigm and affective robotics to provide an adequate reply to this question, at least in its present formulation, I will briefly outline an alternative that lays down a new path in HRI, based in the notions of embodied, embedded, dynamic, and distributed cognition. I claim that these notions are particularly well-suited for designing social institutional forms of HRI, because they permit modelling the relevant cognitive processes as unfolding in the physical space that humans and robots share. The environment provides the resources for HRI such as artefacts, routines, and embodied social norms that simultaneously constrain and enable the emergence of novel institutional practices involving human and machine.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationSocial Robots in Social Institutions
Subtitle of host publicationProceedings of Robophilosophy 2022
EditorsRaul Hakli, Pekka Mäkelä, Johanna Seibt
Place of PublicationHelsinki
PublisherIOS Press
Pages615-620
Number of pages6
ISBN (Electronic)978-1-64368-375-1
ISBN (Print)978-1-64368-374-4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023
EventRobophilosophy 2022: Social Robots in Social Institutions - University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Duration: 2022 Aug 162022 Aug 19
https://cas.au.dk/en/robophilosophy/conferences/rpc2022/

Publication series

NameFrontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications
PublisherIOS Press
Volume366
ISSN (Print)0922-6389
ISSN (Electronic)1879-8314

Conference

ConferenceRobophilosophy 2022
Country/TerritoryFinland
CityHelsinki
Period2022/08/162022/08/19
Internet address

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Robotics
  • Philosophy
  • Interaction Technologies

Free keywords

  • social robots
  • social institution
  • social interaction
  • cognition
  • embodied cognition
  • embedded cognition
  • Dynamic process
  • joint action
  • social practice
  • incremental learning
  • social learning
  • personalisation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Social Robots for Social Institutions: Scaling Up and Cutting Back on Cognition'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
  • Robophilosophy 2022

    Ingar Brinck (Invited speaker)

    2022 Aug 162022 Aug 19

    Activity: Participating in or organising an eventParticipation in conference

Cite this