Research output per year
Research output per year
Kajsa Tenland, Johanna Berggren, Karl Engelsberg, Elin Bohman, Ulf Dahlstrand, Nazia Castelo, Sandra Lindstedt, Rafi Sheikh, Malin Malmsjö
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
PURPOSE: It is generally believed that large eyelid defects must be repaired using a vascularized flap for 1 lamella, while the other can be a free graft. Recent studies indicate that the pedicle of a tarsoconjunctival flap does not contribute to blood perfusion. The purpose of this study was to explore whether large eyelid defects can be repaired using a free bilamellar eyelid autograft alone.
METHODS: Ten large upper and lower eyelid defects resulting from tumor excision were reconstructed using bilamellar grafts harvested from the contralateral or opposing eyelid. Revascularization of the flap was monitored during healing using laser speckle contrast imaging, and the surgical outcome was assessed.
RESULTS: The functional and cosmetic results were excellent. All grafts survived and there was no tissue necrosis. Only 1 patient underwent revision after 4 days as the sutures came loose. Two patients developed minimal ectropion but needed no reoperation. All patients were satisfied with the surgical results. Perfusion monitoring showed that the grafts were gradually revascularized, exhibiting 50% perfusion after 4 weeks and 90% perfusion after 8 weeks.
CONCLUSIONS: A free bilamellar eyelid graft appears to be an excellent alternative to the tarsoconjunctival flap procedure in the reconstruction of both upper and lower eyelid defects, especially in patients who cannot tolerate visual axis occlusion or the 2-stage procedure of the conventional staged flap procedure.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 168-172 |
Journal | Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery |
Volume | 37 |
Issue number | 2 |
Early online date | 2020 May 26 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2021 |
Research output: Thesis › Doctoral Thesis (compilation)
Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter › peer-review