The Best of All PossibleWorlds: Where Interrogative Games Meet Research Agendas

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapterpeer-review

Abstract

Erik J. Olsson and David Westlund have recently argued that the standard belief revision representation of an epistemic state is defective. In order to adequately model an epistemic state one needs, in addition to a belief set (or corpus, or theory, i.e. a set closed under deduction) K and (say) an entrenchment relation E, a research agenda A, i.e. a set of questions satisfying certain corpus-relative preconditions (hence called K-questions) the agent would like to have answers to. Informally, the preconditions guarantee that the set of potential answers represent a partition of possible expansions of K, hence are equivalent to well-behaved sets of alternative hypotheses.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationBelief Revision Meets Philosophy of Science
EditorsErik J. Olsson, Sebastian Enqvist
PublisherSpringer
Pages225-252
Volume21
ISBN (Print)978-90-481-9608-1, 978-90-481-9609-8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Publication series

Name
Volume21

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Philosophy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Best of All PossibleWorlds: Where Interrogative Games Meet Research Agendas'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this