Abstract
In this paper I present the double disjunction task as introduced by Johnson-Laird. This experiment is meant to show how mental model theory explains the discrepancy between logical competence and logical performance of individuals in deductive reasoning. I review the results of the task and identify three problems in the way the task is designed, that all fall under a lack of coordination between the subject and the experimenter, and an insufficient representation of the semantic/pragmatic interface. I then propose a reformulation of the task, that makes explicit the underlying semantic reasoning and emphasizes the difference of interpretation of the DDT between the experimenter and the subjects.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Proceedings of the Logic & Cognition Workshop at ESSLLI 2012 |
Editors | Mickiewicz Adam |
Publisher | CEUR-WS |
Pages | 27-37 |
Publication status | Published - 2012 |
Event | Logic and Cognition - Poznan (Poland) Duration: 2012 May 17 → 2012 May 19 |
Conference
Conference | Logic and Cognition |
---|---|
Period | 2012/05/17 → 2012/05/19 |
Subject classification (UKÄ)
- Philosophy
Free keywords
- Logic
- Cognition
- Propositional Reasoning
- Mental Models Theory