The dynamics of group polarization

Carlo Proietti

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingPaper in conference proceedingpeer-review

Abstract

Exchange of arguments in a discussion often makes individuals more radical about their initial opinion. This phenomenon is known as Group-induced Attitude Polarization. A byproduct of it are bipolarization effects, where the distance between the attitudes of two groups of individuals increases after the discussion. This paper is a first attempt to analyse the building blocks of information exchange and information update that induce polarization. I use Argumentation Frameworks as a tool for encoding the information of agents in a debate relative to a given issue a. I then adapt a specific measure of the degree of acceptability of an opinion (Matt and Toni 2008). Changes in the degree of acceptability of a, prior and posterior to information exchange, serve here as an indicator of polarization. I finally show that the way agents transmit and update information has a decisive impact on polarization and bipolarization.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationLogic, Rationality, and Interaction
Subtitle of host publicationInternational Workshop on Logic, Rationality and Interaction
PublisherSpringer
Pages195-208
Number of pages14
Volume10445 LNCS
ISBN (Print)9783319649993
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017
EventLogic, Rationality, and Interaction : 6th International Workshop - Sapporo, Japan
Duration: 2017 Sept 112017 Sept 14

Publication series

NameLecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
Volume10445 LNCS
ISSN (Print)03029743
ISSN (Electronic)16113349

Conference

ConferenceLogic, Rationality, and Interaction
Abbreviated titleLORI 2017
Country/TerritoryJapan
CitySapporo
Period2017/09/112017/09/14

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Philosophy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The dynamics of group polarization'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this