The effect of perimetric experience in normal subjets

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Two groups of normal subjects were submitted to repeated automated static threshold perimetry. Perimetric results were strongly affected by the level of experience in some subjects; in the majority, however, the effect of experience was small. Initial field tests often showed high numbers of depressed points. Sensitivity increased with perimetric training, particularly between the first sessions. Those subjects who improved most started low, gradually approaching normal levels with experience. Learning effects were more pronounced peripherally than paracentrally and "untrained" fields characteristically showed concentric contraction with numerous points with low sensitivity peripherally. An important practical conclusion is to allow repeated testing of all inexperienced patients in whom initial fields do not agree with clinical findings. A chart showing a concentrically narrowed field should be viewed with particular suspicion. Furthermore, a single initial field may constitute an inadequate baseline for clinical follow-up.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)81-86
JournalArchives of Ophthalmology
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 1989

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Ophthalmology

Free keywords

  • Middle Aged
  • Perimetry
  • Reference Values
  • Sensory Thresholds
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Visual Fields
  • Humans
  • Adult
  • Aged


Dive into the research topics of 'The effect of perimetric experience in normal subjets'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this