The Electoral Choices of Voters with Coalition-Straddling Consideration Sets

Jacob Sohlberg, Annika Fredén

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objectives: Preelectoral party coalitions are common in multiparty systems. We examine the proposition that individuals who choose between parties from competing coalitions think and behave differently compared to those who only consider voting for parties of the same coalition. Part of the reason, we suggest, is that coalition-straddling voters play a key role in deciding who forms government. Methods: We rely on data from a multiwave panel with thousands of participants collected during two election campaigns in Sweden. Statistical regression techniques are used to analyze the data. Results: We find that citizens who straddle opposing coalitions think that the vote decision is harder and rely more on voting advice applications. Moreover, the evidence suggests that their ultimate vote choice is more consequential in how they view parties. Conclusion: Coalition-straddling influences political behavior. The evidence is largely in line with the notion that coalition-straddling individuals are aware of their importance.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1303-1313
Number of pages11
JournalSocial Science Quarterly
Volume101
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020 Jul 1
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Authors. Social Science Quarterly published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Southwestern Social Science Association

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Political Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Electoral Choices of Voters with Coalition-Straddling Consideration Sets'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this