Abstract
The principles of sanctity of life and quality of life are often appealed to in medical decisions at the "edges of life." Notwithstanding their importance in bioethics, these principles are still badly understood. This study is an attempt to clarify their normative significance and content.
Because these principles pertain to the more general question of the value of life, the study begins by exploring the possibility of formulating such a value in today's secular pluralistic health-care. This context is often marked by intractable moral disagreement on issues such as abortion and euthanasia. Despite this disagreement, it is argued that human life might, after all, be considered as an "ultimate" value.
The author interprets the sanctity-of-life principle as affirming that human life is not self-possessed and is inviolable from the moment of conception. The quality-of-life principle, on the other hand, is interpreted as insisting that life is valuable only if it can serve the person whose life it is to acquire other values.
The last chapter explores the relationship between the principles. It is argued that, despite their differences, they can be considered as compatible and that sanctity of life should receive priority in the formulation of any theory of respect for human life.
Because these principles pertain to the more general question of the value of life, the study begins by exploring the possibility of formulating such a value in today's secular pluralistic health-care. This context is often marked by intractable moral disagreement on issues such as abortion and euthanasia. Despite this disagreement, it is argued that human life might, after all, be considered as an "ultimate" value.
The author interprets the sanctity-of-life principle as affirming that human life is not self-possessed and is inviolable from the moment of conception. The quality-of-life principle, on the other hand, is interpreted as insisting that life is valuable only if it can serve the person whose life it is to acquire other values.
The last chapter explores the relationship between the principles. It is argued that, despite their differences, they can be considered as compatible and that sanctity of life should receive priority in the formulation of any theory of respect for human life.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Qualification | Doctor |
| Awarding Institution |
|
| Supervisors/Advisors |
|
| Award date | 1998 May 27 |
| Publisher | |
| ISBN (Print) | 91-7966-521-7 |
| Publication status | Published - 1998 |
Bibliographical note
Defence detailsDate: 1998-05-27
Time: 14:15
Place: Carolinasalen, Kungshuset, Lundagård
External reviewer(s)
Name: Lantz, Göran
Title: Prof.
Affiliation: Stockholm
---
The information about affiliations in this record was updated in December 2015.
The record was previously connected to the following departments: Ethics (015017072)
Subject classification (UKÄ)
- Ethics
Free keywords
- secular ethics
- bioethics
- sanctity of life
- quality of life
- procedural ethics
- utilitarianism
- deontology
- Peter Singer
- Helga Kuhse
- H.T. Engelhardt
- Theology
- Teologi