The Morality of Transparency; Clarity versus Emptiness

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapterResearchpeer-review

139 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

With transparency being either a state of clarity or the exposure emptiness, this paper focuses on the practices of transparency, termed ‘transparenting’. Focus on transparenting practices can provide a better tool for understanding the ‘rise of transparency’, and its moral, practical and political aspects. Three types of transparenting are defined: the voluntary transparenting conducted by organizations, the “flashlight” transparenting of suspicious outsiders, and renegade transparenting by the whistleblower. Examples are given from the field of anti-corruption programs and business ethics and compliance. Through a focus on transparenting, we can better understand both the risks and dark sides of transparency.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationDer Transparenz-Imperativ: Normen, Strukturen, Praktiken
EditorsVincent August, Franz Osrecki
Place of PublicationWiesbaden
PublisherSpringer
Chapter2
Pages37-62
ISBN (Print)978-3-658-22294-9
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Bibliographical note

Accepted draft manuscript. Final publication in press.

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Social Anthropology

Free keywords

  • Social Anthropology
  • Transparency
  • corruption
  • anti-corruption
  • Business ethics
  • Compliance
  • transparenting
  • organizational transparency

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Morality of Transparency; Clarity versus Emptiness'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this