The Natural vs. Human Sciences: Myth, Methodology, and Ontology

Rögnvaldur Ingthorsson

Research output: Contribution to specialist publication or newspaperSpecialist publication articlePopular science

Abstract

I argue that the human sciences (i.e. humanities, social- and behavioural sciences) should not try to imitate the methodology of the natural sciences. The human sciences study meaningful phenomena whose nature is decisively different from the merely physical phenomena studied by the natural sciences, and whose study therefore require different methods; meaningful phenomena do not obviously obey natural laws while the merely physical necessarily does. This is not to say that the human sciences do not study an objective reality about which we cannot have genuine knowledge. The notion of objective reality is discussed, and it is suggested that social constructions can be understood as objectively real entities.
Original languageEnglish
Pages13-29
Volume22
No.1
Specialist publicationDiscusiones Filosóficas
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Philosophy

Free keywords

  • philosophy
  • human science
  • methodology
  • natural science
  • philosophy of science
  • objectivity
  • objective reality
  • social constructions

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Natural vs. Human Sciences: Myth, Methodology, and Ontology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this