The Personal is Political – And Then What? Ideology, Representation, and Legitimacy in a Swedish Disability Organisation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Who can or cannot claim to represent other members within the disability rights movement has been discussed for decades, mainly concerning being disabled as an eligibility prerequisite. Aim(s): The aim is to analyse arguments concerning representational claims within a Swedish disability rights organisation (DHR, Disability Human Rights). Method: Every member of DHR was given the opportunity to answer three open-ended questions. Answers were subjected to a qualitative content analysis. Results: Two main dimensions of arguments were found. The ideological dimension legitimises representation through lived experience or a human rights approach. The pragmatic dimension legitimises representation through relational claims or organisational necessities. Further analysis revealed a paradox: When a representative is required to have a body with certain characteristics, other knowledge-related aspects risk devaluation. Conclusion(s): Paradoxically, the organisation has a goal of rendering impairment irrelevant in society, while rendering impairment a main issue when electing representatives.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)198-211
Number of pages14
JournalScandinavian Journal of Disability Research
Volume25
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023 Jun 21

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, Stockholm University Press. All rights reserved.

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Social Sciences Interdisciplinary
  • Social Work
  • Political Science (excluding Public Administration Studies and Globalization Studies)

Free keywords

  • Disability rights organisation
  • elected representative
  • representation
  • Sweden

Cite this