The politics of climate finance coordination

Erik Lundsgaarde; Kevin Adams; Kendra Dupuy; Adis Dzebo; Mikkel Funder; Adam Moe Fejerskov; Zoha  Shawoo; Jakob Skovgaard

The politics of climate finance coordination

Erik Lundsgaarde, Kevin Adams, Kendra Dupuy, Adis Dzebo, Mikkel Funder, Adam Moe Fejerskov, Zoha Shawoo, Jakob Skovgaard

Research output: Working paper/Preprint › Working paper

290 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

• Climate finance coordination challenges reflect political differences, including divergent interests among ministries involved in the governance of multilateral climate funds.
• Differences in the histories and governance of the Climate Investment Funds (CIF) and Green Climate Fund (GCF) – two key multilateral climate funds – shape debate on their respective advantages and future roles.
• The multilateral funds have encouraged cross-governmental coordination at country level. However, there are competing views on which governmental actors at national level are best-suited to take responsibility for coordinating climate finance planning and implementation.
• The cross-sectoral orientation of climate finance coordination contrasts with existing development coordination approaches, which emphasize coordination within separate policy sectors.

Original language	English
Publisher	Stockholm Environment Institute
Publication status	Published - 2021

Publication series

Name	SEI Policy Briefs

Subject classification (UKÄ)

Political Science (excluding Public Administration Studies and Globalization Studies)

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

2SEI Policy brief_CF coordinationFinal published version, 1.47 MB

https://cdn.sei.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/211015a-burton-shawoo-climate-finance-pb-2109f-final.pdf

SoS: Share or Spare? Explaining the Nature and Determinants of Climate Finance Coordination
Skovgaard, J., Moe Fejerskov, A., Funder, M., Adams, K., Dzebo, A., Shawoo, Z. & Dupuy, K.
Swedish Research Council
2018/01/01 → 2022/12/31
Project: Research

Cite this

@techreport{6994151fcc304ee4be445f94b1fb6051,

title = "The politics of climate finance coordination",

abstract = "• Climate finance coordination challenges reflect political differences, including divergent interests among ministries involved in the governance of multilateral climate funds.• Differences in the histories and governance of the Climate Investment Funds (CIF) and Green Climate Fund (GCF) – two key multilateral climate funds – shape debate on their respective advantages and future roles.• The multilateral funds have encouraged cross-governmental coordination at country level. However, there are competing views on which governmental actors at national level are best-suited to take responsibility for coordinating climate finance planning and implementation.• The cross-sectoral orientation of climate finance coordination contrasts with existing development coordination approaches, which emphasize coordination within separate policy sectors.",

author = "Erik Lundsgaarde and Kevin Adams and Kendra Dupuy and Adis Dzebo and Mikkel Funder and {Moe Fejerskov}, Adam and Zoha Shawoo and Jakob Skovgaard",

year = "2021",

language = "English",

series = "SEI Policy Briefs",

publisher = "Stockholm Environment Institute",

type = "WorkingPaper",

institution = "Stockholm Environment Institute",

}

TY - UNPB

T1 - The politics of climate finance coordination

AU - Lundsgaarde, Erik

AU - Adams, Kevin

AU - Dupuy, Kendra

AU - Dzebo, Adis

AU - Funder, Mikkel

AU - Moe Fejerskov, Adam

AU - Shawoo, Zoha

AU - Skovgaard, Jakob

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - • Climate finance coordination challenges reflect political differences, including divergent interests among ministries involved in the governance of multilateral climate funds.• Differences in the histories and governance of the Climate Investment Funds (CIF) and Green Climate Fund (GCF) – two key multilateral climate funds – shape debate on their respective advantages and future roles.• The multilateral funds have encouraged cross-governmental coordination at country level. However, there are competing views on which governmental actors at national level are best-suited to take responsibility for coordinating climate finance planning and implementation.• The cross-sectoral orientation of climate finance coordination contrasts with existing development coordination approaches, which emphasize coordination within separate policy sectors.

AB - • Climate finance coordination challenges reflect political differences, including divergent interests among ministries involved in the governance of multilateral climate funds.• Differences in the histories and governance of the Climate Investment Funds (CIF) and Green Climate Fund (GCF) – two key multilateral climate funds – shape debate on their respective advantages and future roles.• The multilateral funds have encouraged cross-governmental coordination at country level. However, there are competing views on which governmental actors at national level are best-suited to take responsibility for coordinating climate finance planning and implementation.• The cross-sectoral orientation of climate finance coordination contrasts with existing development coordination approaches, which emphasize coordination within separate policy sectors.

M3 - Working paper

T3 - SEI Policy Briefs

BT - The politics of climate finance coordination

PB - Stockholm Environment Institute

ER -

The politics of climate finance coordination

Abstract

Publication series

Subject classification (UKÄ)

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Projects

SoS: Share or Spare? Explaining the Nature and Determinants of Climate Finance Coordination

Cite this