Abstract
Popular science description
The agrarian reforms of the 18th century were some of the most momentous historical events in Danish history. In the span of 30 years, half of all peasants went from living in a state of serfdom to owning and cultivating their own plots of land, free from the onerous ties of manorial dependence that they had toiled under for hundreds of years. In this pioneering dissertation, Markus Christian Hansen examines the development and use of natural law ideas amongst the pro-reformist militants. He shows how notions of right, obligation, and contract were systematically linked together with historical analyses of Danish society, resulting in a powerful argument in favour of state interventionin the manorial system. By using a Political Marxist theoretical and methodological framework, Christian Hansen reveals that the Danish aristocracy was not a single, unified group, but rather comprised two qualitatively distinctive entities with antagonistic interests. When the Danish economy entered a crisis in the 18th century, a fatal state-coup resulted in the destruction of one fraction by the other. This was the context within which natural jurisprudence was deployed.
The agrarian reforms of the 18th century were some of the most momentous historical events in Danish history. In the span of 30 years, half of all peasants went from living in a state of serfdom to owning and cultivating their own plots of land, free from the onerous ties of manorial dependence that they had toiled under for hundreds of years. In this pioneering dissertation, Markus Christian Hansen examines the development and use of natural law ideas amongst the pro-reformist militants. He shows how notions of right, obligation, and contract were systematically linked together with historical analyses of Danish society, resulting in a powerful argument in favour of state interventionin the manorial system. By using a Political Marxist theoretical and methodological framework, Christian Hansen reveals that the Danish aristocracy was not a single, unified group, but rather comprised two qualitatively distinctive entities with antagonistic interests. When the Danish economy entered a crisis in the 18th century, a fatal state-coup resulted in the destruction of one fraction by the other. This was the context within which natural jurisprudence was deployed.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Qualification | Doctor |
| Awarding Institution |
|
| Supervisors/Advisors |
|
| Award date | 2025 Apr 4 |
| Place of Publication | Lund |
| Publisher | |
| ISBN (Print) | 978-91-89874-88-6 |
| ISBN (electronic) | 978-91-89874-89-3 |
| Publication status | Published - 2025 Apr 4 |
Bibliographical note
Defence detailsDate: 2025-04-04
Time: 13:00
Place: C126, LUX
External reviewer
Name: Engelst Nørgaard, Anne
Title: Førsteamanuensis
Affiliation: Norges teknisk-naturvitenskapelige universitet
---
Subject classification (UKÄ)
- History
Free keywords
- agrarian reform
- absolutism
- natural law
- rights
- serfdom
- Political Marxism
- class conflict
- historical materialism
- aristocracy
- feudalism
- nobility
- intellectual history
- Denmark
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Politics of Natural Law: Agrarian Reform, Intra-Aristocratic Conflict, and Natural Jurisprudence in Denmark, c. 1750-1800'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Projects
- 1 Finished
-
The Politics of Natural Law: Agrarian Reform, Intra-Aristocratic Conflict, and Natural Jurisprudence in Denmark, c. 1750-1800
Hansen, M. (Researcher)
2020/09/01 → 2025/04/04
Project: Dissertation
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver