TY - JOUR
T1 - The redistributive effect of health care finance in twelve OECD countries
AU - Van Doorslaer, Eddy
AU - Wagstaff, Adam
AU - Van Der Burg, Hattem
AU - Christiansen, Terkel
AU - Citoni, Guido
AU - Di Biase, Rita
AU - Gerdtham, Ulf G.
AU - Gerfin, Mike
AU - Gross, Lorna
AU - Häkinnen, Unto
AU - John, Jürgen
AU - Johnson, Paul
AU - Klavus, Jan
AU - Lachaud, Claire
AU - Lauritsen, Jørgen
AU - Leu, Robert
AU - Nolan, Brian
AU - Pereira, João
AU - Propper, Carol
AU - Puffer, Frank
AU - Rochaix, Lise
AU - Schellhorn, Martin
AU - Sundberg, Gun
AU - Winkelhake, Olaf
PY - 1999/6/1
Y1 - 1999/6/1
N2 - The OECD countries finance their health care through a mixture of taxes, social insurance contributions, private insurance premiums and out-of-pocket payments. The various payment sources have very different implications for both vertical and horizontal equity and on redistributive effect which is a function of both. This paper presents results on the income redistribution consequences of the health care financing mixes adopted in twelve OECD countries by decomposing the overall income redistributive effect into a progressivity, horizontal inequity and reranking component. The general finding of this study is that the vertical effect is much more important than horizontal inequity and reranking in determining the overall redistributive effect but that their relative importance varies by source of payment. Public finance sources tend to have small positive redistributive effects and less differential treatment while private financing sources generally have (larger) negative redistributive effects which are to a substantial degree caused by differential treatment.
AB - The OECD countries finance their health care through a mixture of taxes, social insurance contributions, private insurance premiums and out-of-pocket payments. The various payment sources have very different implications for both vertical and horizontal equity and on redistributive effect which is a function of both. This paper presents results on the income redistribution consequences of the health care financing mixes adopted in twelve OECD countries by decomposing the overall income redistributive effect into a progressivity, horizontal inequity and reranking component. The general finding of this study is that the vertical effect is much more important than horizontal inequity and reranking in determining the overall redistributive effect but that their relative importance varies by source of payment. Public finance sources tend to have small positive redistributive effects and less differential treatment while private financing sources generally have (larger) negative redistributive effects which are to a substantial degree caused by differential treatment.
KW - Health care financing
KW - Horizontal equity
KW - Progressivity
KW - Redistributive effect
KW - Reranking
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033016597&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0167-6296(98)00043-5
DO - 10.1016/S0167-6296(98)00043-5
M3 - Review article
C2 - 10537897
AN - SCOPUS:0033016597
SN - 0167-6296
VL - 18
SP - 291
EP - 313
JO - Journal of Health Economics
JF - Journal of Health Economics
IS - 3
ER -