The Rustic Turn during Late Socialism and the Popular Movement against Soviet Rule

Violeta Davoliūtė, Odeta Rudling

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The success of mass mobilization in Lithuania against Soviet rule in the late 1980s can be attributed in part to the spread of the ethnographic movement in the post-Stalin era. Characterized in this paper as the “rustic turn,” it began in the late 1950s with the rehabilitation of kraevedenie (local area studies), part of Khrushchev’s effort to rejuvenate grassroots political participation across the USSR. In Lithuania, the rehabilitation of kraštotyra had the unintended consequence of restoring nation-building practices from the interwar period and reintegrating individuals repressed under Stalin into public life. Rather than shaping Soviet subjects, the ethnographic movement developed rituals of transformation that imbued the rustic ethnic past, not the Soviet future, with the aura of sacrality. Vigilantly depoliticized, the movement nevertheless cultivated strong associative ties among citizens from various walks of life. With the outbreak of free discussion under glasnost’, mass gatherings built upon the rituals of the ethnographic movement to generate a community of affect grounded in nostalgia for a lost, mythical past and the trauma of displacement under the Soviet regime.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)30-51
JournalCanadian Slavonic Papers
Volume65
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • History

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Rustic Turn during Late Socialism and the Popular Movement against Soviet Rule'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this