Abstract
The primary aim of the article is to examine the sum of the three Swedish judgments of 2013 that was handed down after the ECJ's judgment in the Åkerberg Fransson-case. The examination is done against the backdrop of the legal developments preceding
these judgments, with a particular attention to how different layers of law are perceived and given effect in the national legal order.
these judgments, with a particular attention to how different layers of law are perceived and given effect in the national legal order.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 54-66 |
Journal | Europarättslig tidskrift |
Volume | 17 |
Issue number | 1 |
Publication status | Published - 2014 |
Subject classification (UKÄ)
- Law
Keywords
- EU
- Legal pluralism
- Ne Bis in Idem
- Double Jeopardy
- ECHR
- tax
- EU-rätt
- EU law