The TOS2 study: An international multi-centre audit assessing the standard of neurological examination

Jason Philip Appleton, A. Ilinca, Arne Lindgren, A. Puschmann, M. Habahbeh, Khurram A Siddiqui, R. DeSilva, M. Jones, Richard Butterworth, D.J. Nicholl

Research output: Contribution to journalPublished meeting abstractpeer-review

Abstract

Having previously demonstrated that in-patients referred to neurology at two UK hospitals were not fully examined prior to referral, we designed an audit with 80% power to detect a 10% increase in tendon hammer or ophthalmoscope use following an educational intervention. In-patients referred to neurology over a 4 month period in the UK, Jordan, Sweden and the United Arab Emirates were asked whether they recalled examination with a Tendon hammer, Ophthalmoscope and Stethoscope since admission. Results were disseminated to local medical teams and data were collected for a further 4 months. Pre and post-intervention data were available for 11 centres with 407 and 391 patients in each arm. 264 patients (64.86%) recalled examination with a tendon hammer preintervention, which significantly improved to 298 (76.21%) (p
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry
Volume86
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy

Free keywords

  • human
  • clinical audit
  • neurologist
  • neurologic examination
  • patient
  • tendon
  • examination
  • neurology
  • ophthalmoscope
  • stethoscope
  • United Kingdom
  • ophthalmoscopy
  • arm
  • United Arab Emirates
  • Sweden
  • Jordan
  • hospital

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The TOS2 study: An international multi-centre audit assessing the standard of neurological examination'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this