The Use of OECD Commentaries as Interpretative Aids: The Static/Ambulatory Approaches Debate Considered from the Perspective of International Law

Ulf Linderfalk; Maria Hilling

The Use of OECD Commentaries as Interpretative Aids: The Static/Ambulatory Approaches Debate Considered from the Perspective of International Law

Research output: Working paper/Preprint › Working paper

Original language	English
Number of pages	47
Publication status	Published - 2014

Subject classification (UKÄ)

Law

Free keywords

Public international law

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2526664

Cite this

@techreport{232b4e5c7c2743229e361f227596354f,

title = "The Use of OECD Commentaries as Interpretative Aids: The Static/Ambulatory Approaches Debate Considered from the Perspective of International Law",

keywords = "Public international law, Folkr{\"a}tt",

author = "Ulf Linderfalk and Maria Hilling",

year = "2014",

language = "English",

type = "WorkingPaper",

}

TY - UNPB

T1 - The Use of OECD Commentaries as Interpretative Aids: The Static/Ambulatory Approaches Debate Considered from the Perspective of International Law

AU - Linderfalk, Ulf

AU - Hilling, Maria

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

KW - Public international law

KW - Folkrätt

M3 - Working paper

BT - The Use of OECD Commentaries as Interpretative Aids: The Static/Ambulatory Approaches Debate Considered from the Perspective of International Law

ER -