Time characteristics of the effect of alcohol cessation on the risk of stomach cancer a meta-analysis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

221 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: In the Bagnardi et al. (2001) meta-analysis, it was found that alcohol consumption increases the risk of stomach cancer (OR = 1.32 for heavy drinkers). However, it is unknown if drinking cessation reverses this alcohol-elevated risk. Methods: A systematic literature review was performed to provide the information for a meta-analysis where the dose-risk trend was estimated for years since drinking cessation and the risk of stomach cancer. A random effect generalised least squares model for trend estimation was used, employing study characteristics to control for heterogeneity. Results: Nineteen observational studies were identified in the literature review, of which five studies quantified duration of cessation and risk of stomach cancer, giving a total of 1947 cancer cases. No significant effect of drinking cessation on the risk of stomach cancer could be found (OR = 0.99 CI: 0.97-1.02). Conclusions: This result should be interpreted with caution due to the limited number of studies in this area. Recent findings suggest a link between heavy drinking and stomach cancer, especially gastric noncardia, but not for moderate drinking. Since all but one of the included studies in this meta-analysis failed to control for consumption level, the current study could not test if the risk decline following drinking cessation differs between moderate and high consumers.
Original languageEnglish
Article number600
JournalBMC Public Health
Volume13
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and Epidemiology

Free keywords

  • Alcohol cessation
  • Stomach cancer
  • Meta-analysis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Time characteristics of the effect of alcohol cessation on the risk of stomach cancer a meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this