Abstract
In this commentary, we reflect on the program chair experience of ICIS 2015 to pass on some useful organizational memory for the IS community at large. We also reflect on volunteer effort required for a high-quality conference and the challenges of maintaining quality over a diverse and dispersed reviewing effort. We ask whether we can count on this volunteer effort in a changing higher education context where universities value volunteer effort or service less than promotion and tenure. We make several wide-ranging recommendations to preserve organizational memory and ensure the ongoing excellence of ICIS. Finally, we elaborate on some hard questions about whether the current conference model is fit for purpose and consider alternative models for our high-quality conference.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 8 |
Pages (from-to) | 179-197 |
Number of pages | 19 |
Journal | Communications of the Association for Information Systems |
Volume | 41 |
DOIs |
|
Publication status | Published - 2017 Aug |
Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2017 by the Association for Information Systems.
Subject classification (UKÄ)
- Information Systems, Social aspects
Free keywords
- AIS
- Conference management
- ICIS