Total intravenous general anaesthesia vs. spinal anaesthesia for total hip arthroplasty: a randomised, controlled trial.

Andreas Harsten; H Kehlet; P Ljung; Sören Toksvig-Larsen

doi:10.1111/aas.12456

Total intravenous general anaesthesia vs. spinal anaesthesia for total hip arthroplasty: a randomised, controlled trial.

Andreas Harsten, H Kehlet, P Ljung, Sören Toksvig-Larsen

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

The choice of anaesthetic technique for patients undergoing joint arthroplasty is debatable. The hypothesis of this study was that general anaesthesia would generate a more favourable recovery profile than spinal anaesthesia.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	298-309
Journal	Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Volume	59
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.12456
Publication status	Published - 2015

Subject classification (UKÄ)

Anesthesiology and Intensive Care

Access to Document

10.1111/aas.12456

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25522681?dopt=Abstract

Cite this

@article{008d81b002e8433a827e46602ab6c41f,

title = "Total intravenous general anaesthesia vs. spinal anaesthesia for total hip arthroplasty: a randomised, controlled trial.",

abstract = "The choice of anaesthetic technique for patients undergoing joint arthroplasty is debatable. The hypothesis of this study was that general anaesthesia would generate a more favourable recovery profile than spinal anaesthesia.",

author = "Andreas Harsten and H Kehlet and P Ljung and S{\"o}ren Toksvig-Larsen",

year = "2015",

doi = "10.1111/aas.12456",

language = "English",

volume = "59",

pages = "298--309",

journal = "Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica",

issn = "0001-5172",

publisher = "Blackwell Munksgaard",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Total intravenous general anaesthesia vs. spinal anaesthesia for total hip arthroplasty: a randomised, controlled trial.

AU - Harsten, Andreas

AU - Kehlet, H

AU - Ljung, P

AU - Toksvig-Larsen, Sören

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - The choice of anaesthetic technique for patients undergoing joint arthroplasty is debatable. The hypothesis of this study was that general anaesthesia would generate a more favourable recovery profile than spinal anaesthesia.

AB - The choice of anaesthetic technique for patients undergoing joint arthroplasty is debatable. The hypothesis of this study was that general anaesthesia would generate a more favourable recovery profile than spinal anaesthesia.

U2 - 10.1111/aas.12456

DO - 10.1111/aas.12456

M3 - Article

C2 - 25522681

SN - 0001-5172

VL - 59

SP - 298

EP - 309

JO - Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica

JF - Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica

IS - 3

ER -

Total intravenous general anaesthesia vs. spinal anaesthesia for total hip arthroplasty: a randomised, controlled trial.

Abstract

Subject classification (UKÄ)

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this