Toward developing consensus on family-centred care: An international descriptive study and discussion

Mohammad A. Al-Motlaq, Bernie Carter, Sarah Neill, Inger Kristensson Hallstrom, Mandie Foster, Imelda Coyne, Diana Arabiat, Philip Darbyshire, Veronica D. Feeg, Linda Shields

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Nurses around the world have described family-centred care (FCC) in various ways. With limited evidence regarding its implementation and with dissent among professionals regarding outcomes that are amorphously defined across age groups, systems and global settings, a group of children’s nursing experts from around the world collaborated to seek clarification of the terms, deconstruct the elements in the model and describe empirically a consensus of values toward operationally defining FCC. A modified Delphi method was used drawing on expert opinions of participants from eight countries to develop a contemporary and internationally agreed list of 27 statements (descriptors of FCC) that could form the foundation for a measure for future empirical psychometric study of FCC across settings and countries. Results indicated that even among FCC experts, understandings of FCC differ and that this may account for some of the confusion and conceptual disagreement. Recommendations were identified to underpin the development of a clearer vision of FCC.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)458-467
    Number of pages10
    JournalJournal of Child Health Care
    Volume23
    Issue number3
    Early online date2018 Jan 1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2019 Sept 1

    Subject classification (UKÄ)

    • Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy

    Free keywords

    • Culture and cultural issues
    • Delphi technique
    • evidence-based practice
    • family-centred care

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Toward developing consensus on family-centred care: An international descriptive study and discussion'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this