Aim: To compare treatment costs with alternative luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist preparations and determine whether a leuprorelin solid implant is associated with potential cost savings. Patients & methods: A hypothetical population of 1000 prostate cancer patients was apportioned between the three most commonly-prescribed LHRH agonist preparations. Differentiated annual costs for 1- and 3-monthly formulations were calculated for France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the UK (EU5) and Sweden, and compared with the leuprorelin solid implant. Results: Compared with alternative formulations, leuprorelin solid implants had potential annual cost savings/1000 patients of Euro353,000 (EU5) and Euro699,000 (Sweden; 1-month formulations), and Euro259,000 (EU5) and Euro300,000 (Sweden; 3-month formulations). Conclusion: The leuprorelin solid implant was associated with potential cost savings compared with the most commonly used LHRH agonist preparations.
Subject classification (UKÄ)
- Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy
- luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone
- prostate cancer