Two Sides of the Same Coin: Bootstrapping the Restricted vs. Unrestricted Model

Panagiotis Mantalos

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The properties of the bootstrap test for restrictions are studied in two versions: 1) bootstrapping under the null hypothesis, restricted, and 2) bootstrapping under the alternative hypothesis, unrestricted. This article demonstrates the equivalence of these two methods, and illustrates the small sample properties of the Wald test for testing Granger-Causality in a stable stationary VAR system by Monte Carlo methods. The analysis regarding the size of the test reveals that, as expected, both bootstrap tests have actual sizes that lie close to the nominal size. Regarding the power of the test, the Wald and bootstrap tests share the same power as the use of the Size-Power Curves on a correct size-adjusted basis.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)35-42
JournalJournal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods
Volume4
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2005

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Probability Theory and Statistics

Free keywords

  • VAR system
  • words: Bootstrap
  • Granger-Causality
  • Wald test

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Two Sides of the Same Coin: Bootstrapping the Restricted vs. Unrestricted Model'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this