Abstract
The concept of personality is scrutinized as used both in common parlance and in more sophisticated frames of reference. Current multidimensional models are criticized for their reliance on self-descriptive questionnaires and for their lack of a hierarchical dimension, differentiating more or less decisive determinants of behavior. A possible psychoanalytic model is viewed with more benevolence but rejected in the end because of associationistic remnants still dominating its meta-theory. Instead a superordinate morel of personality is offered, based on process as its central ingredient.
| Original language | Swedish |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 23-30 |
| Journal | Nordisk Psykologi: Teori, Forskning, Praksis |
| Volume | 55 |
| Publication status | Published - 2003 |
Subject classification (UKÄ)
- Psychology
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver