Film clips and still pictures captured by civilians, or citizen journalists, are increasingly used as evidence by judges or the police to prove specific accounts of events. This kind of visual data is, however, not without problems. The aim of this paper is to analyse how viewers perceived a mobile phone film clip as naturalistic data, enabling processes of shaming and eventually a ‘justice’ process on the Internet, including virtual punishment of the person filmed by the photographer. In the clip, a taxi driver records video of an agitated female customer whom he hinders from leaving the taxi. The film is then distributed on YouTube, where it attracts remarkable negative attention. However, the film clip is only one of several possible accounts of the filmed incident, as demonstrated by the police report about the incident as an alternative account showing that viewers cannot rely on the citizen journalistic film clip as objective, naturalistic data.
|Publication status||Unpublished - 2016|
|Event||Nordiska samarbetsrådet för kriminologi. Konferens Island 2016. - , Iceland|
Duration: 2016 May 1 → 2016 Aug 3
|Conference||Nordiska samarbetsrådet för kriminologi. Konferens Island 2016.|
|Period||2016/05/01 → 2016/08/03|
Subject classification (UKÄ)
- Law and Society