Abstract
This paper argues that innovation diffusion is not a rational implementation process, but more accurately portrayed as a highly social process, involving sets of intermediate organizations that contribute to a product’s reputation. Empirically it builds on two case studies, one cultural and one science-based, to demonstrate there are industry differences in where innovations get validated: validating intermediaries are centralized in few global nodes in the case of theatre, and decentralized in each marketplace in the case of pharmaceutical vaccines. This pattern is counterintuitive, because it is different from what we would expect based on the spatial organization of their production activities. These findings have implications for policy: can we assume innovations will readily diffuse (and export) outside their region of origin?
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1058-1075 |
Number of pages | 18 |
Journal | Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy |
Volume | 34 |
Issue number | 6 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2016 Sept 1 |
Subject classification (UKÄ)
- Social Sciences Interdisciplinary
Free keywords
- cultural industries
- Diffusion
- innovation policy
- knowledge-based economy
- science