When the dust has settled: A final note on replication

Frédéric Delmar

Research output: Contribution to journalLetterpeer-review

Abstract

Honing and Samuelsson have in a two papers (2014, 2015) criticized the Delmar and Shane (2003) paper on several grounds: The data are difficult to replicate; conflicting results with another paper using the same data and similar independent variable; the inability to fully rule out reversed causality because of tied events; and what is the choice of relevant dependent variable. I also commented on several of these issues in an earlier response (Delmar, 2015) and an informative commentary was also made by Davidsson (2015). To bring some final clarity, I will here address the issue of replication and the issue of conflicting results by explaining how Delmar and Shane constructed their data set.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)20-21
JournalJournal of Business Venturing Insights
Volume4
Issue numberDecember
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Business Administration

Free keywords

  • Initial milestone
  • Nascent entrepreneurship
  • Replication

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'When the dust has settled: A final note on replication'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this