Law, Probability and Risk, 1470-840X

Journal

More filtering options
More filtering options

All authors

Reset
to
1 - 8 out of 8Page size: 50
  1. 2020

  2. Are judges influenced by legally irrelevant circumstances?

    My Bergius, Emelie Ernberg, Christian Dahlman & Farhan Sarwar, 2020, In: Law, Probability and Risk. 19, 2, p. 157–164

    Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

  3. 2019

  4. Dahlman and Mackor on Coherence and Probability in Legal Evidence

    Erik J Olsson, 2019 Dec 20, In: Law, Probability and Risk. p. 295–303

    Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

  5. Coherence and probability in legal evidence

    Christian Dahlman & Anne Ruth Mackor, 2019, In: Law, Probability and Risk. 18, 4, p. 275-294

    Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

  6. Introduction

    Christian Dahlman, 2019, In: Law, Probability and Risk. 18, 4, p. 235 1 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journal › Debate/Note/Editorial

  7. The Opportunity Prior - A Proof-Based Prior for Criminal Cases

    Norman Fenton, David Lagnado, Christian Dahlman & Martin Neil, 2019, In: Law, Probability and Risk. 18, 4, p. 237–253

    Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

  8. 2018

  9. Determining the Base Rate for Guilt

    Christian Dahlman, 2018 Mar 1, In: Law, Probability and Risk. 17, 1, p. 15–28

    Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

  10. 2016

  11. Miss rate neglect in legal evidence.

    Christian Dahlman, Frank Zenker & Farhan Sarwar, 2016, In: Law, Probability and Risk. 15, 4, p. 239-250

    Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

  12. 2015

  13. The felony fallacy

    Christian Dahlman, 2015, In: Law, Probability and Risk.

    Research output: Contribution to journal › Article