Christian Dahlman

Professor,
More filtering options
  1. Debiasing and Rule of Law

    Frank Zenker & Christian Dahlman, 2016, Legal Argumentation and the Rule of Law . Feteris, E., Kloosterhuis, H., Plug, J. & Smith, C. (eds.). The Hague: Eleven International Publishing, p. 217-229

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapter

  2. Reliable Debiasing Techniques in Legal Contexts? Weak Signals from a darker Corner of the Social Science Universe

    Frank Zenker & Christian Dahlman, 2016, The psychology of argument: Cognitive approaches to argumentation and persuasion . Paglieri, F., Bonelli, L. & Felleti, S. (eds.). College Publications, p. 173-196 (Studies in Logic and Argumentation; vol. 59).

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapter

  3. Giving Reasons Pro et Contra as a Debiasing Technique in Legal Decision Making

    Frank Zenker, Christian Dahlman & Sarwar, F., 2016, Argumentation and Reasoned Action : Vol. I : proceedings of the 1st European conference on argumentation, Lisbon 2015. Mohammed, D. & Lewinski, M. (eds.). London: College Publications, p. 809-823 (Studies in Logic; vol. 62).

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingPaper in conference proceeding

  4. Reasons Pro et Contra as a Debiasing Technique in Legal Contexts

    Frank Zenker, Christian Dahlman, Rasmus Bååth & Sarwar, F., 2018, In : Psychological Reports. 121, 3, p. 511-526

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  5. Några nyare teorier

    David Reidhav, Christian Dahlman, Nergelius, J. & Christoffer Wong, 2001, Rättsfilosofi : samhälle och moral genom tiderna. Nergelius, J. (ed.). Studentlitteratur AB, Vol. 1. uppl.. p. 137-164

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapter

  6. Nyare teorier

    David Reidhav, Christian Dahlman, Edvinsson, R., Nergelius, J. & Christoffer Wong, 2006, Rättsfilosofi : samhälle och moral genom tiderna. Nergelius, J. (ed.). Studentlitteratur AB, Vol. 2. uppl.. p. 156-193

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapter

  7. Att bedöma personer med kriminell belastning

    My Pettersson, Christian Dahlman & Sarwar, F., 2016, In : Svensk Juristtidning. 1

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  8. The Effect of Ambiguous Question Wording on Jurors’ Presumption of Innocence

    Martire, K. A. & Christian Dahlman, 2019 Sep 23, In : Psychology, Crime and Law.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  9. The opportunity prior: A simple and practical solution to the prior probability problem for legal cases

    Fenton, N., Lagnado, D., Christian Dahlman & Neil, M., 2017 Jun 12, Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, ICAIL 2017. Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), p. 69-78 10 p.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingPaper in conference proceeding

  10. The Opportunity Prior - A Proof-Based Prior for Criminal Cases

    Fenton, N., Lagnado, D., Christian Dahlman & Neil, M., 2019, In : Law, Probability and Risk. mgz007

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  11. The felony fallacy

    Christian Dahlman, 2015, In : Law, Probability and Risk.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  12. Robust trust in expert testimony

    Christian Dahlman, Lena Wahlberg & Sarwar, F., 2015, In : Humana.Mente. 28, p. 17-37

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  13. Unacceptable generalizations in arguments on legal evidence

    Christian Dahlman, 2016, In : Argumentation.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  14. Om rättsvetenskapens auktoritet

    Christian Dahlman, 2007, In : Allmän rättslära - Rättsteoretiska seminarier. 75, p. 89-95

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  15. The function of Opinio Juris in customary international law

    Christian Dahlman, 2012, In : Nordic Journal of International Law. 81, p. 327-339

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  16. Oacceptabla generaliseringar i bevisvärdering

    Christian Dahlman, 2015, In : Tidsskrift for Rettsvitenskap. 5

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  17. Europeisk harmonisering av produktansvar

    Christian Dahlman, 2003, In : Europarättslig tidskrift. 1, p. 97-114

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  18. En dialog om framtida preferenser

    Christian Dahlman, 2006, In : Filosofisk tidskrift. 1, p. 15-18

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  19. The difference between obedience assumed and obedience accepted

    Christian Dahlman, 2009, In : Ratio Juris. p. 187-196

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  20. When conventionalism goes too far

    Christian Dahlman, 2011, In : Ratio Juris. 24, 3, p. 335-346

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  21. Produktsäkerhet och rättsekonomi

    Christian Dahlman, 2001, In : Juridisk tidskrift vid Stockholms Universitet. 2, p. 278-292

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  22. Neutralitet i juridisk forskning

    Christian Dahlman, 2006, Studentlitteratur AB. 96 p.

    Research output: Book/ReportBook

Previous 1 2 3 Next