Christian Dahlman

Professor,
More filtering options
  1. Debiasing and Rule of Law

    Frank Zenker & Christian Dahlman, 2016, Legal Argumentation and the Rule of Law . Feteris, E., Kloosterhuis, H., Plug, J. & Smith, C. (eds.). The Hague: Eleven International Publishing, p. 217-229

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapter

  2. Reliable Debiasing Techniques in Legal Contexts? Weak Signals from a darker Corner of the Social Science Universe

    Frank Zenker & Christian Dahlman, 2016, The psychology of argument: Cognitive approaches to argumentation and persuasion . Paglieri, F., Bonelli, L. & Felleti, S. (eds.). College Publications, p. 173-196 (Studies in Logic and Argumentation; vol. 59).

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapter

  3. Giving Reasons Pro et Contra as a Debiasing Technique in Legal Decision Making

    Frank Zenker, Christian Dahlman & Sarwar, F., 2016, Argumentation and Reasoned Action : Vol. I : proceedings of the 1st European conference on argumentation, Lisbon 2015. Mohammed, D. & Lewinski, M. (eds.). London: College Publications, p. 809-823 (Studies in Logic; vol. 62).

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingPaper in conference proceeding

  4. Reasons Pro et Contra as a Debiasing Technique in Legal Contexts

    Frank Zenker, Christian Dahlman, Rasmus Bååth & Sarwar, F., 2018, In : Psychological Reports. 121, 3, p. 511-526

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  5. Några nyare teorier

    David Reidhav, Christian Dahlman, Nergelius, J. & Christoffer Wong, 2001, Rättsfilosofi : samhälle och moral genom tiderna. Nergelius, J. (ed.). Studentlitteratur AB, Vol. 1. uppl.. p. 137-164

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapter

  6. Nyare teorier

    David Reidhav, Christian Dahlman, Edvinsson, R., Nergelius, J. & Christoffer Wong, 2006, Rättsfilosofi : samhälle och moral genom tiderna. Nergelius, J. (ed.). Studentlitteratur AB, Vol. 2. uppl.. p. 156-193

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapter

  7. Att bedöma personer med kriminell belastning

    My Pettersson, Christian Dahlman & Sarwar, F., 2016, In : Svensk Juristtidning. 1

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  8. The Effect of Ambiguous Question Wording on Jurors’ Presumption of Innocence

    Martire, K. A. & Christian Dahlman, 2019 Sep 23, In : Psychology, Crime and Law.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  9. The opportunity prior: A simple and practical solution to the prior probability problem for legal cases

    Fenton, N., Lagnado, D., Christian Dahlman & Neil, M., 2017 Jun 12, Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, ICAIL 2017. Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), p. 69-78 10 p.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingPaper in conference proceeding

  10. The Opportunity Prior - A Proof-Based Prior for Criminal Cases

    Fenton, N., Lagnado, D., Christian Dahlman & Neil, M., 2019, In : Law, Probability and Risk. mgz007

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  11. The felony fallacy

    Christian Dahlman, 2015, In : Law, Probability and Risk.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  12. Robust trust in expert testimony

    Christian Dahlman, Lena Wahlberg & Sarwar, F., 2015, In : Humana.Mente. 28, p. 17-37

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  13. Unacceptable generalizations in arguments on legal evidence

    Christian Dahlman, 2016, In : Argumentation.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  14. Om rättsvetenskapens auktoritet

    Christian Dahlman, 2007, In : Allmän rättslära - Rättsteoretiska seminarier. 75, p. 89-95

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  15. The function of Opinio Juris in customary international law

    Christian Dahlman, 2012, In : Nordic Journal of International Law. 81, p. 327-339

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  16. Oacceptabla generaliseringar i bevisvärdering

    Christian Dahlman, 2015, In : Tidsskrift for Rettsvitenskap. 5

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  17. Europeisk harmonisering av produktansvar

    Christian Dahlman, 2003, In : Europarättslig tidskrift. 1, p. 97-114

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  18. En dialog om framtida preferenser

    Christian Dahlman, 2006, In : Filosofisk tidskrift. 1, p. 15-18

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  19. The difference between obedience assumed and obedience accepted

    Christian Dahlman, 2009, In : Ratio Juris. p. 187-196

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  20. When conventionalism goes too far

    Christian Dahlman, 2011, In : Ratio Juris. 24, 3, p. 335-346

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  21. Produktsäkerhet och rättsekonomi

    Christian Dahlman, 2001, In : Juridisk tidskrift vid Stockholms Universitet. 2, p. 278-292

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  22. Neutralitet i juridisk forskning

    Christian Dahlman, 2006, Studentlitteratur AB. 96 p.

    Research output: Book/ReportBook

  23. Rättspositivismens ekonomiska grund

    Christian Dahlman, 2005, Studier i rättsekonomi: festskrift till Ingemar Ståhl. Dahlman, C. (ed.). Studentlitteratur AB, p. 43-54

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapter

  24. Rätt och rättfärdigande - En tematisk introduktion i allmän rättslära

    Christian Dahlman, 2007, Studentlitteratur AB. 157 p.

    Research output: Book/ReportBook

  25. Habermas

    Christian Dahlman, 2001, Rättsfilosofi - Samhälle och moral genom tiderna, 1:a uppl.. Nergelius, J. (ed.). Studentlitteratur AB, p. 143-147

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapter

  26. Objektiv moral: tro det den som vill

    Christian Dahlman, 2002, Studentlitteratur AB. 151 p.

    Research output: Book/ReportBook

  27. Appeal to expert testimony - A Bayesian approach

    Christian Dahlman & Lena Wahlberg, 2015, Argument types and fallacies in legal argumentation. Bustamante, T. (ed.). Springer, p. 3-18

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapter

  28. Rättsekonomi: en introduktion, 2:a uppl.

    Christian Dahlman, Glader, M. & David Reidhav, 2004, Studentlitteratur AB. 253 p. (2 uppl.)

    Research output: Book/ReportBook

  29. Kritisk rättsteori

    Christian Dahlman, 2001, Rättsfilosofi - Samhälle och moral genom tiderna, 1:a uppl.. Nergelius, J. (ed.). Studentlitteratur AB, p. 128-136

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapter

  30. Does making the law more coherent also make it more acceptable?

    Christian Dahlman, 1997, Justice, morality and society - A tribute to Aleksander Peczenik. Juristförlaget i Lund, p. 119-122

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapter

  31. Rättsekonomi: en introduktion

    Christian Dahlman, Glader, M. & David Reidhav, 2002, Studentlitteratur AB. 229 p. (1 uppl.)

    Research output: Book/ReportBook

  32. Studier i rättsekonomi : festskrift till Ingemar Ståhl

    Christian Dahlman (ed.), 2005, Studentlitteratur AB. 256 p.

    Research output: Book/ReportAnthology (editor)

  33. Lag som offentlig uppfostran : om Thomas av Aquinos rättsfilosofi

    Christian Dahlman, 2008, Förbistringar och förklaringar - Festskrift till Anders Piltz. Jönsson, A. (ed.). Språk- och litteraturcentrum, Lunds universitet, p. 199-207

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapter

  34. Sweden

    Christian Dahlman & Lotta Wendel, 2001, Cases on medical malpractice in a comparative perspective. Faure, M. (ed.). Springer, p. 188-200

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapter

  35. The Effect of Imprecise Expressions in Argumentation-Theory and Experimental Results

    Christian Dahlman, Sarwar, F., Rasmus Bååth, Lena Wahlberg & Sverker Sikström, 2012, ARGUMENTATION 2012: International Conference on Alternative Methods of Argumentation in Law. Masaryk University, p. 15-30

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingPaper in conference proceeding

  36. Fallacies in ad hominem arguments

    Christian Dahlman, David Reidhav & Lena Wahlberg, 2013, Legal Argumentation Theory: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives. Dahlman, C. & Feteris, E. (eds.). Springer, p. 57-70

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapter

  37. Legal argumentation theory: Cross-disciplinary perspectives

    Christian Dahlman (ed.), 2013, Springer. 230 p. (Law and philosophy library; vol. 102)

    Research output: Book/ReportAnthology (editor)

  38. Konkurrerande culpakriterier

    Christian Dahlman, 2000, Studentlitteratur AB. 180 p.

    Research output: ThesisDoctoral Thesis (monograph)

  39. Predictable rules and flexible principles

    Christian Dahlman, 2002, Legisprudence: a new theoretical approach to legislation. Wintgens, L. J. (ed.). Hart Publishing Ltd, p. 81-85

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapter

  40. Values, rights and duties in legal and philosophical discourse

    Christian Dahlman (ed.) & Krawietz, W. (ed.), 2005, Duncker & Humblot. 275 p. (Rechtstheorie Beiheft)

    Research output: Book/ReportAnthology (editor)

  41. Rätt och rättfärdigande, 2:a uppl.

    Christian Dahlman, 2010, Studentlitteratur AB. 128 p.

    Research output: Book/ReportBook

  42. Bergwallkommissionen ­förbiser de stora bristerna i domstolarnas bevisvärdering

    Christian Dahlman, 2015 Jun 8, Dagens Nyheter.

    Research output: Contribution to specialist publication or newspaperNewspaper article

  43. Adjudicative and epistemic recognition

    Christian Dahlman, 2004, In : Analisi e diritto. p. 229-242

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  44. On division and coordination in the legal system

    Christian Dahlman, 1995, Legal reasoning, interpretation of fundamental rights and principles. Troper, M. (ed.).

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingPaper in conference proceeding

  45. Fused modality or confused modality?

    Christian Dahlman, 2004, In : Ratio Juris. 17, 1, p. 80-86

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  46. Har straff ett moraliskt egenvärde?

    Christian Dahlman, 2011, Dagens juridik.

    Research output: Contribution to specialist publication or newspaperSpecialist publication article

Previous 1 2 Next