Christian Dahlman

Professor,
More filtering options
  1. Adjudicative and epistemic recognition

    Christian Dahlman, 2004, In : Analisi e diritto. p. 229-242

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Anmälan av Erling Eide: Bevisvurdering – Usikkerhet og sannsynlighet.

    Christian Dahlman, 2017, In : Tidsskrift for strafferett. 17, 1, p. 75-78

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview (Book/Film/Exhibition/etc.)

  3. Appeal to expert testimony - A Bayesian approach

    Christian Dahlman & Lena Wahlberg, 2015, Argument types and fallacies in legal argumentation. Bustamante, T. (ed.). Springer, p. 3-18

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapter

  4. Argument types and fallacies in legal argumentation

    Bustamante, T. (ed.) & Christian Dahlman (ed.), 2015, Springer.

    Research output: Book/ReportAnthology (editor)

  5. Att bedöma personer med kriminell belastning

    My Pettersson, Christian Dahlman & Sarwar, F., 2016, In : Svensk Juristtidning. 1

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  6. Avtalslagen 2010 är inte en rättskälla

    Christian Dahlman, 2010, Dagens juridik.

    Research output: Contribution to specialist publication or newspaperSpecialist publication article

  7. Begreppet rättskälla

    Christian Dahlman, 2019, Juridiska grundbegrepp: En vänbok till David Reidhav. Dahlman, C. & Wahlberg, L. (eds.). Studentlitteratur, p. 55-74 20 p.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapter

  8. Bergwallkommissionen ­förbiser de stora bristerna i domstolarnas bevisvärdering

    Christian Dahlman, 2015 Jun 8, Dagens nyheter.

    Research output: Contribution to specialist publication or newspaperNewspaper article

  9. Beviskraft: Metod för bevisvärdering i brottmål

    Christian Dahlman, 2018, 1 ed. Stockholm: Norstedts Juridik AB. 351 p. (Institutet för rättsvetenskaplig forskning)

    Research output: Book/ReportBook

  10. Debiasing and Rule of Law

    Frank Zenker & Christian Dahlman, 2016, Legal Argumentation and the Rule of Law . Feteris, E., Kloosterhuis, H., Plug, J. & Smith, C. (eds.). The Hague: Eleven International Publishing, p. 217-229

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapter

  11. De-Biasing Legal Fact-Finders with Bayesian Thinking

    Christian Dahlman, 2019, In : Topics in Cognitive Science.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  12. Determining the Base Rate for Guilt

    Christian Dahlman, 2018 Mar 1, In : Law, Probability and Risk. 17, 1, p. 15–28

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  13. Does making the law more coherent also make it more acceptable?

    Christian Dahlman, 1997, Justice, morality and society - A tribute to Aleksander Peczenik. Juristförlaget i Lund, p. 119-122

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapter

  14. En dialog om framtida preferenser

    Christian Dahlman, 2006, In : Filosofisk tidskrift. 1, p. 15-18

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  15. Europeisk harmonisering av produktansvar

    Christian Dahlman, 2003, In : Europarättslig tidskrift. 1, p. 97-114

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  16. Fallacies in ad hominem arguments

    Christian Dahlman, David Reidhav & Lena Wahlberg, 2013, Legal Argumentation Theory: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives. Dahlman, C. & Feteris, E. (eds.). Springer, p. 57-70

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapter

  17. Fallacies in ad hominem arguments

    Christian Dahlman, David Reidhav & Lena Wahlberg, 2011, In : Cogency. 3, 2, p. 105-124

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  18. Fused modality or confused modality?

    Christian Dahlman, 2004, In : Ratio Juris. 17, 1, p. 80-86

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  19. Giving Reasons Pro et Contra as a Debiasing Technique in Legal Decision Making

    Frank Zenker, Christian Dahlman & Sarwar, F., 2016, Argumentation and Reasoned Action : Vol. I : proceedings of the 1st European conference on argumentation, Lisbon 2015. Mohammed, D. & Lewinski, M. (eds.). London: College Publications, p. 809-823 (Studies in Logic; vol. 62).

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingPaper in conference proceeding

  20. Good coherence and bad coherence

    Christian Dahlman, 2000, In : Associations. p. 85-92

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  21. Habermas

    Christian Dahlman, 2001, Rättsfilosofi - Samhälle och moral genom tiderna, 1:a uppl.. Nergelius, J. (ed.). Studentlitteratur AB, p. 143-147

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapter

  22. Har straff ett moraliskt egenvärde?

    Christian Dahlman, 2011, Dagens juridik.

    Research output: Contribution to specialist publication or newspaperSpecialist publication article

  23. Inledning

    Christian Dahlman & Lena Wahlberg, 2019, Juridiska grundbegrepp: En vänbok till David Reidhav. Dahlman, C. & Wahlberg, L. (eds.). Studentlitteratur, p. 13-18

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapter

Previous 1 2 3 Next