Christian Dahlman

Professor,
More filtering options
  1. Article
  2. Generalization in Legal Argumentation

    Frank Zenker, Christian Dahlman, Sverker Sikström, Lena Wahlberg & Sarwar, F., 2020, In : Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice. 20, 1, p. 80-99 10 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. The Effect of Ambiguous Question Wording on Jurors’ Presumption of Innocence

    Martire, K. A. & Christian Dahlman, 2019 Sep 23, In : Psychology, Crime and Law.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  4. De-Biasing Legal Fact-Finders with Bayesian Thinking

    Christian Dahlman, 2019, In : Topics in Cognitive Science.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  5. The Opportunity Prior - A Proof-Based Prior for Criminal Cases

    Fenton, N., Lagnado, D., Christian Dahlman & Neil, M., 2019, In : Law, Probability and Risk. mgz007

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  6. Coherence and probability in legal evidence

    Christian Dahlman & Mackor, A. R., 2019, In : Law, Probability and Risk. 18, 4, p. 275-294

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  7. Determining the Base Rate for Guilt

    Christian Dahlman, 2018 Mar 1, In : Law, Probability and Risk. 17, 1, p. 15–28

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  8. Reasons Pro et Contra as a Debiasing Technique in Legal Contexts

    Frank Zenker, Christian Dahlman, Rasmus Bååth & Sarwar, F., 2018, In : Psychological Reports. 121, 3, p. 511-526

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  9. Varför är bevisning som uppfyller beviskravet i våldtäktsmål inte tillräcklig i mål om olaga hot?

    Christian Dahlman & Korths-Aspegren, A., 2018, In : Svensk Juristtidning. 2018, 4, p. 327-342

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  10. Unacceptable generalizations in arguments on legal evidence

    Christian Dahlman, 2016, In : Argumentation.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next