Analysing hope: The live possibility account

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bibtex

@article{f5ca215b7cef48eab1c45329f29e40d8,
title = "Analysing hope: The live possibility account",
abstract = "The orthodox definition of hope suffers from an exclusion problem: it is unable to exclude subjects without hope. In fact, the orthodox definition even allows for despair to be falsely classified as hope. This problem suggests two basic desiderata for a successful analysis of hope: it should solve the exclusion problem, and it should have the resources to explain why, in a given situation, a subject does or does not form a hope. Bearing these desiderata in mind, I assess two recent hope-accounts offered by Jack M. C. Kwong and Cheshire Calhoun. I then offer my own view, which is based on the Jamesian notion of a “live possibility”. I suggest that a possibility needs to reach a certain probability threshold in order to count as live, and according to my account, to hope is to desire the truth of such a live possibility. This view is well-equipped to solve the exclusion problem, and it can explain why a subject does or does not hope.",
author = "Palmqvist, {Carl Johan}",
year = "2020",
month = aug,
day = "17",
doi = "10.1111/ejop.12584",
language = "English",
journal = "European Journal of Philosophy",
issn = "0966-8373",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}