Causally Redundant Social Objects: Rejoinder to Elder-Vass

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In Elder-Vass’s response to my (2014) it is maintained: (1) that a social object is not identical with but is merely composed of its suitably interrelated parts; (2) that a social object is necessarily indistinguishable in terms of its causal capacities from its interrelated parts; and (3) that ontological individualism lacks an adequate ontological justification (Elder-Vass forthcoming). In this reply, I argue that in view of (1) the so-called redescription principle defended by Elder-Vass ought to be reformulated and renamed; that the conjunction of (1) and (2) renders social objects causally redundant; and that ontological individualism can be coherently formulated and theoretically justified within Elder-Vass’s own metaphysics of objects with causal powers.

Details

Authors
Organisations
Research areas and keywords

Subject classification (UKÄ) – MANDATORY

  • Philosophy

Keywords

  • causal power, critical realism, emergence, mereology, ontological individualism, social structure
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)798-809
JournalPhilosophy of the Social Sciences
Volume44
Issue number6
Publication statusPublished - 2014
Publication categoryResearch
Peer-reviewedYes

Total downloads

No data available

Related projects

Björn Petersson, Olle Blomberg, Gunnar Björnsson, Johan Brännmark, Åsa Burman, Tobias Hansson Wahlberg, Patrizio Lo Presti, Anna-Sofia Maurin, Jeroen Smid & Andras Szigeti

Swedish Research Council

2012/03/01 → …

Project: NetworkNational collaboration

View all (2)