Cemented tibial component fixation performs better than cementless fixation: a randomized radiostereometric study comparing porous-coated, hydroxyapatite-coated and cemented tibial components over 5 years.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Details

Authors
Organisations
Research areas and keywords

Subject classification (UKÄ) – MANDATORY

  • Orthopedics

Keywords

  • Knee: surgery, Porosity, Prosthesis Design, Prosthesis Failure, Reoperation, Female, Humans, Knee Prosthesis, Male, Osteoarthritis, Durapatite, Comparative Study, Biocompatible, Tibia: radiography, Tibia: surgery, Treatment Outcome, Knee, Bone Cements, Coated Materials, Replacement, Aged, Arthroplasty
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)362-369
JournalActa Orthopaedica
Volume76
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2005
Publication categoryResearch
Peer-reviewedYes

Bibliographic note

The information about affiliations in this record was updated in December 2015. The record was previously connected to the following departments: Orthopaedics (013242900), Reconstructive Surgery (013240300), Medical Radiology Unit (013241410)