Collective Responsibility and Acting Together

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapter

Abstract

What is the moral significance of the contrast between acting together and strategic interaction? We argue that while collective moral responsibility is not uniquely tied to the former, the degree to which the participants in a shared intentional wrongdoing are blameworthy is normally higher than when agents bring about the same wrong as a result of strategic interaction. One argument for this claim focuses on the fact that shared intentions cause intended outcomes in a more robust manner than the intentions involved in strategic interaction. We argue, however, that this in itself is not significant. The significant difference is rather volitional: The parties to a shared intention are mutually implicated in each other’s will in a distinct way. Since degree of blameworthiness depends on the quality of will an agent displays in her actions, this explains the higher degree of collective blameworthiness associated with shared intentional wrongdoing.

Details

Authors
Organisations
External organisations
  • University of Groningen
Research areas and keywords

Subject classification (UKÄ) – MANDATORY

  • Philosophy
  • Ethics
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Routledge Handbook of Collective Responsibility
EditorsSaba Bazargan-Forward, Deborah Tollefsen
PublisherRoutledge
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2019
Publication categoryResearch
Peer-reviewedNo

Total downloads

No data available

Related projects

Björn Petersson, Olle Blomberg, Gunnar Björnsson, Johan Brännmark, Åsa Burman, Tobias Hansson Wahlberg, Patrizio Lo Presti, Anna-Sofia Maurin, Jeroen Smid & Andras Szigeti

Swedish Research Council

2012/03/01 → …

Project: Network

View all (2)