Conclusiveness resolves the conflict between quality of evidence and imprecision in GRADE

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The objective of our article is to show how “quality of evidence” and “imprecision,” as they are defined in Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) articles, may lead to confusion. We focus only on the context of systematic reviews.

Details

Authors
Organisations
External organisations
  • Swedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services
Research areas and keywords

Subject classification (UKÄ) – MANDATORY

  • Medical Ethics
  • Philosophy

Keywords

Original languageEnglish
Article numberJCE9148
Pages (from-to)1-5
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume2016
Issue number75
Publication statusPublished - 2016 Jun 18
Publication categoryResearch
Peer-reviewedYes

Total downloads

No data available

Related projects

Johan Brännmark, Johannes Persson, Lena Wahlberg, Annika Wallin, Eva Sjöstrand, Nils-Eric Sahlin, Sten Anttila, Charlotta Levay, Niklas Vareman, Lena Wahlberg, Wändi Bruine de Bruin, Alexander D. Davis, Baruch Fischhoff & Barbara McNeil

2015/01/012021/12/31

Project: Research

View all (1)