Conclusiveness resolves the conflict between quality of evidence and imprecision in GRADE

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bibtex

@article{c414e9cffc264f64b42df4f9859f99c6,
title = "Conclusiveness resolves the conflict between quality of evidence and imprecision in GRADE",
abstract = "The objective of our article is to show how “quality of evidence” and “imprecision,” as they are defined in Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) articles, may lead to confusion. We focus only on the context of systematic reviews.",
keywords = "GRADE, Imprecision, Conclusiveness, Accuracy, Confidence in estimate, Quality of evidence",
author = "Sten Anttila and Johannes Persson and Niklas Vareman and Nils-Eric Sahlin",
year = "2016",
month = "6",
day = "18",
doi = "10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.03.019",
language = "English",
volume = "2016",
pages = "1--5",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Epidemiology",
issn = "1878-5921",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "75",

}